<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sleepless in Asentar</title>
	<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/</link>
	<description>CareToLive &#124; Help Men With Late Stage Prostate Cancer &#124; Provenge Now!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dendreon</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator>dendreon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-2408</guid>
		<description>[...] stage prostate cancer. Howard I. Scher and Thomas Fleming both said they had trouble sleeping. So,http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/Notes from Dendreon&#38;39s annual meeting - Seattle Post IntelligencerI didn&#38;39t attend Dendreon&#38;39s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] stage prostate cancer. Howard I. Scher and Thomas Fleming both said they had trouble sleeping. So,http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/Notes from Dendreon&#38;39s annual meeting - Seattle Post IntelligencerI didn&#38;39t attend Dendreon&#38;39s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stages of sleep</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>stages of sleep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>[...] stage prostate cancer. Howard I. Scher and Thomas Fleming both said they had trouble sleeping. So,http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/Sleep - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaSleep proceeds in cycles of REM and the four stages of NREM, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] stage prostate cancer. Howard I. Scher and Thomas Fleming both said they had trouble sleeping. So,http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/Sleep - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaSleep proceeds in cycles of REM and the four stages of NREM, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walk</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Walk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I am also sleepless, but for an entirely different reason. I know first hand what this deadly decease does to a human being. It effects the young as well as the elderly and is not bias to any one race or background. I am aware of the terrible suffering that not only the poor cancer patient has to endure, but their family's, friends and loved ones also suffer in many different degrees. I am not going to get into the subject of the many elected cowards that have been notified of this terrible wrong and have yet to stand up and fight for the people as they were elected to do. Instead most are staying on the sidelines weighing out how can interceding in this terrible dilemma help my own personal position and career. 

What I will address is how can so called Doctors that fully understand and know first hand what this decease does to the human body and the suffering that these poor helpless patients have to endure daily, sell out every aspect of what their profession is supposed to stand up for under any condition. Do they fully understand what the term " DO NO HARM " means?  One must understand that in this particular case at hand, is there are many so called Doctors that took part in this derailment of a promising vaccine that very well could extend or even cure this deadly decease for PC patients that are now left with very little hope, because of these so called Doctors criminal actions. I state criminal, because when one sells out a patients welfare for their own  selfish personal gain, which in return causes continued suffering and even death, then it is criminal to do so, no matter how hard  they have tried to confuse the true facts.

This is a proven safe vaccine and therefore should have been given an approval under the minimum conditions of being labeled for terminally ill PC patients and to have allowed them continued hope and the benefit of the possibility of extending their lives or even curing them of this deadly decease. The standard of care so to speak, would have only come after showing the true effects while maintaining hope for these poor patients. This is what would have been called using caution and at the same time, DOING NO HARM".  Every one of you so called doctors that was a part of this derailment of provenge, have brought shame to your medical profession, your family, your peers and humanity itself. I did not cap doctors anymore, because in my book, you are worse than a common thug and the title of ( Doctor )should be stripped forever, due to your outrages actions in this case at hand. For the continued majority of good and caring true Doctors out there, I commend you and your chosen profession in helping your patients and not lowering your standards as these so called doctors have done for their own personal gains. I only hope that some of the Good Doctors that are aware of this outrages situation will stand up and shame each and every one of these rouge so called doctors each and every chance that becomes available, because the truth is they have slapped you in the face without regard to your profession. Shame on them forever. 

                                                     Lady Justice will prevail in the end , signed, Walk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also sleepless, but for an entirely different reason. I know first hand what this deadly decease does to a human being. It effects the young as well as the elderly and is not bias to any one race or background. I am aware of the terrible suffering that not only the poor cancer patient has to endure, but their family&#8217;s, friends and loved ones also suffer in many different degrees. I am not going to get into the subject of the many elected cowards that have been notified of this terrible wrong and have yet to stand up and fight for the people as they were elected to do. Instead most are staying on the sidelines weighing out how can interceding in this terrible dilemma help my own personal position and career. </p>
<p>What I will address is how can so called Doctors that fully understand and know first hand what this decease does to the human body and the suffering that these poor helpless patients have to endure daily, sell out every aspect of what their profession is supposed to stand up for under any condition. Do they fully understand what the term &#8221; DO NO HARM &#8221; means?  One must understand that in this particular case at hand, is there are many so called Doctors that took part in this derailment of a promising vaccine that very well could extend or even cure this deadly decease for PC patients that are now left with very little hope, because of these so called Doctors criminal actions. I state criminal, because when one sells out a patients welfare for their own  selfish personal gain, which in return causes continued suffering and even death, then it is criminal to do so, no matter how hard  they have tried to confuse the true facts.</p>
<p>This is a proven safe vaccine and therefore should have been given an approval under the minimum conditions of being labeled for terminally ill PC patients and to have allowed them continued hope and the benefit of the possibility of extending their lives or even curing them of this deadly decease. The standard of care so to speak, would have only come after showing the true effects while maintaining hope for these poor patients. This is what would have been called using caution and at the same time, DOING NO HARM&#8221;.  Every one of you so called doctors that was a part of this derailment of provenge, have brought shame to your medical profession, your family, your peers and humanity itself. I did not cap doctors anymore, because in my book, you are worse than a common thug and the title of ( Doctor )should be stripped forever, due to your outrages actions in this case at hand. For the continued majority of good and caring true Doctors out there, I commend you and your chosen profession in helping your patients and not lowering your standards as these so called doctors have done for their own personal gains. I only hope that some of the Good Doctors that are aware of this outrages situation will stand up and shame each and every one of these rouge so called doctors each and every chance that becomes available, because the truth is they have slapped you in the face without regard to your profession. Shame on them forever. </p>
<p>                                                     Lady Justice will prevail in the end , signed, Walk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyoto27</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyoto27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>“When doctors consider whether to prescribe certain treatments, "it may be time we focus less on statistical significance alone, and more on patient benefit." He noted, for example, that just-released data from a trial of satraplatin plus prednisone did not confirm a survival benefit, but did suggest that the combination was effective against pain, which appeared to translate into a slowing in progression of clinical symptoms.”

Dr. Howard Scher 
February, 2007 
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Urology/ASCOProstate/tb/5142

Is the FDA still a science based agency or is it now all about money and politics?
Provenge is the rare cancer drug that works better than existing therapies and has virtually no side effects. The only reason it was not approved is that the drug belongs to a small independent biotech company, and entrenched powers within the FDA have been effectively controlled by big pharmaceutical companies working on competing products. 

These companies want to sell their toxic and less effective chemotherapies to the same patients, so they lobby FDA docs like Howard Scher and Maha Hussein to insist on large trials meeting ever-higher statistical standards well beyong the legal FDA mandate. They do this by hiring Scher and Hussein as consultants or funding their research on big pharma drugs. 

The policies that Scher and Hussain promote in the FDA then sets playing field that tilts in favor of big pharma, as small biotechs who don't have the resources to run huge trials have to either stop product development or sell out cheaply to big pharma. So the FDA rapidly approves drugs with known serious side effects to treat large numbers of patients for chronic conditions when the drugs belong to big pharma (like Merck's Vioxx of arthritis or GSK's Avandia for diabetes), and yet won't approve a true advance in cancer treatment for patients who have a life expectancy of less than 2 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“When doctors consider whether to prescribe certain treatments, &#8220;it may be time we focus less on statistical significance alone, and more on patient benefit.&#8221; He noted, for example, that just-released data from a trial of satraplatin plus prednisone did not confirm a survival benefit, but did suggest that the combination was effective against pain, which appeared to translate into a slowing in progression of clinical symptoms.”</p>
<p>Dr. Howard Scher<br />
February, 2007<br />
<a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Urology/ASCOProstate/tb/5142" rel="nofollow">http://www.medpagetoday.com/Urology/ASCOProstate/tb/5142</a></p>
<p>Is the FDA still a science based agency or is it now all about money and politics?<br />
Provenge is the rare cancer drug that works better than existing therapies and has virtually no side effects. The only reason it was not approved is that the drug belongs to a small independent biotech company, and entrenched powers within the FDA have been effectively controlled by big pharmaceutical companies working on competing products. </p>
<p>These companies want to sell their toxic and less effective chemotherapies to the same patients, so they lobby FDA docs like Howard Scher and Maha Hussein to insist on large trials meeting ever-higher statistical standards well beyong the legal FDA mandate. They do this by hiring Scher and Hussein as consultants or funding their research on big pharma drugs. </p>
<p>The policies that Scher and Hussain promote in the FDA then sets playing field that tilts in favor of big pharma, as small biotechs who don&#8217;t have the resources to run huge trials have to either stop product development or sell out cheaply to big pharma. So the FDA rapidly approves drugs with known serious side effects to treat large numbers of patients for chronic conditions when the drugs belong to big pharma (like Merck&#8217;s Vioxx of arthritis or GSK&#8217;s Avandia for diabetes), and yet won&#8217;t approve a true advance in cancer treatment for patients who have a life expectancy of less than 2 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Themis</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Themis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>It seems amazing to me that more people are not outraged by this screamingly overt sabotage.  I don't know why EVERY cancer advocacy group is not up in arms over such a blatant power play.  What are *news* media doing repetedly pumping out sensationalist pop-culture crap?  Check out just about every big media source and you'll see what's going on with "K-Fed and Brittney" or shill spew spinning the corruption of big money (big pharma, government, beauracracy).

That's why Caretolive is so very important.  The focus is for the individual patients and their own right to make decisions and choose how to live. Amazingly, for FDA in the case of Provenge the patients are last or not even in the equation at all.  Testing has been done for years.  It's safe.  Experts weighed in and the votes on the AC Panel was overwhelmingly in favor of approval.  WHY was this expert panel disregarded?  WHAT was Richard Pazdur even doing meddling about, passing notes to Maha Hussein, who conviently had her own letter leaked to the Cancer Letter echoing Scher and Flemming's dissent from the panel of experts clearly dominant opinion.

And where is Andrew Von E?  HOW and WHY has he let this corruption flourish under his new watch as head chief of FDA?  Is he facilitating Pazdur's iron fist rule and power mongering?  There have been rumors about Von E possibly appointing Pazdur to a new saftey chief position.  So, Pazdur leaks the ImClone information to some lawyer "mistakenly", threatens walk-outs and such when his Ontology "club" doesn't get what they want, and derails Provenge by obvious measures.  Hmm, what a perfect candidate for a safety chief.  All of these men dying from APC because they are denied their own right to choose drugs like Provenge, are they safe?  Are they safe from possible mild, flu-like symptoms when they are dying?  Is his concern for absolute statistical purity good reason to eliminate a novel drug that is safe and apparently increasing survival.  Why not conditionally approve?

Why indeed.  Lots of questions to be asked while the FDA discloses none of the answer.  Corrupt FDA officals should have NO immunity from questioning their actions.  They are supposed to serve the people not themselves.

May they reap what they sow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems amazing to me that more people are not outraged by this screamingly overt sabotage.  I don&#8217;t know why EVERY cancer advocacy group is not up in arms over such a blatant power play.  What are *news* media doing repetedly pumping out sensationalist pop-culture crap?  Check out just about every big media source and you&#8217;ll see what&#8217;s going on with &#8220;K-Fed and Brittney&#8221; or shill spew spinning the corruption of big money (big pharma, government, beauracracy).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Caretolive is so very important.  The focus is for the individual patients and their own right to make decisions and choose how to live. Amazingly, for FDA in the case of Provenge the patients are last or not even in the equation at all.  Testing has been done for years.  It&#8217;s safe.  Experts weighed in and the votes on the AC Panel was overwhelmingly in favor of approval.  WHY was this expert panel disregarded?  WHAT was Richard Pazdur even doing meddling about, passing notes to Maha Hussein, who conviently had her own letter leaked to the Cancer Letter echoing Scher and Flemming&#8217;s dissent from the panel of experts clearly dominant opinion.</p>
<p>And where is Andrew Von E?  HOW and WHY has he let this corruption flourish under his new watch as head chief of FDA?  Is he facilitating Pazdur&#8217;s iron fist rule and power mongering?  There have been rumors about Von E possibly appointing Pazdur to a new saftey chief position.  So, Pazdur leaks the ImClone information to some lawyer &#8220;mistakenly&#8221;, threatens walk-outs and such when his Ontology &#8220;club&#8221; doesn&#8217;t get what they want, and derails Provenge by obvious measures.  Hmm, what a perfect candidate for a safety chief.  All of these men dying from APC because they are denied their own right to choose drugs like Provenge, are they safe?  Are they safe from possible mild, flu-like symptoms when they are dying?  Is his concern for absolute statistical purity good reason to eliminate a novel drug that is safe and apparently increasing survival.  Why not conditionally approve?</p>
<p>Why indeed.  Lots of questions to be asked while the FDA discloses none of the answer.  Corrupt FDA officals should have NO immunity from questioning their actions.  They are supposed to serve the people not themselves.</p>
<p>May they reap what they sow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Scher and others like him want Guinea Pigs for money.  It doesn't matter how many Guinea Pigs die if the eventual payout is a few billion to investors and pharmaceutical companies.  

We continue to hear publicity campaigns from various organizations that want donations to search for a cure for cancer.  Searching for "the cure" is largely a joke, a ruse supported by the big pharmaceutical companies.  The drug companies don't want a cure.  They want money.  And the most money is in chemotherapy and cancer pain management.  Imagine the hit pain management and disease management drug sales would have taken if the age of immunotherapy would have begun.

All of the big pharmaceutical companies are aware of Dendreon. In the weeks before the FDA decision, witness the Bristol Meyers head of research saying Provenge would never be approved.  Bristol Meyers has a cancer treatment franchise.  Dendreon can advance cancer treatment by miles, possibly curing many men of PC and eventually curing many people of cancer with its platform. Companies like Bristol Meyers and investors like Howard Scher do not want to see Dendreon succeed.  Unfortunately, there are a lot of companies like Bristol Meyers and doctor-investors like Scher. Scher and others like him want Guinea Pigs for money.  It doesn't matter how many Guinea Pigs die if the eventual payout is a few billion to investors and pharma companies.  

We continue to hear publicity campaigns from various organizations that want donations to search for a cure for cancer.  Searching for "the cure" is largely a joke, a ruse supported by the big pharmaceutical companies.  The drug companies don't want a cure.  They want money.  And the most money is in chemotherapy and cancer pain management.  Imagine the hit pain management and disease management drug sales would have taken if the age of  immunotherapy would have begun.

All of the big pharmaceutical companies are aware of Dendreon. In the weeks before the FDA decision, witness the Bristol Meyers head of research saying Provenge would never be approved.  Bristol Meyers has a cancer treatment franchise.  Dendreon can advance cancer treatment by miles, possibly curing many men of PC and eventually curing many people of cancer with its platform. Companies like Bristol Meyers and investors like Howard Scher do not want to see Dendreon succeed.  Unfortunately, there are a lot of companies like Bristol Meyers and doctor-investors like Scher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scher and others like him want Guinea Pigs for money.  It doesn&#8217;t matter how many Guinea Pigs die if the eventual payout is a few billion to investors and pharmaceutical companies.  </p>
<p>We continue to hear publicity campaigns from various organizations that want donations to search for a cure for cancer.  Searching for &#8220;the cure&#8221; is largely a joke, a ruse supported by the big pharmaceutical companies.  The drug companies don&#8217;t want a cure.  They want money.  And the most money is in chemotherapy and cancer pain management.  Imagine the hit pain management and disease management drug sales would have taken if the age of immunotherapy would have begun.</p>
<p>All of the big pharmaceutical companies are aware of Dendreon. In the weeks before the FDA decision, witness the Bristol Meyers head of research saying Provenge would never be approved.  Bristol Meyers has a cancer treatment franchise.  Dendreon can advance cancer treatment by miles, possibly curing many men of PC and eventually curing many people of cancer with its platform. Companies like Bristol Meyers and investors like Howard Scher do not want to see Dendreon succeed.  Unfortunately, there are a lot of companies like Bristol Meyers and doctor-investors like Scher. Scher and others like him want Guinea Pigs for money.  It doesn&#8217;t matter how many Guinea Pigs die if the eventual payout is a few billion to investors and pharma companies.  </p>
<p>We continue to hear publicity campaigns from various organizations that want donations to search for a cure for cancer.  Searching for &#8220;the cure&#8221; is largely a joke, a ruse supported by the big pharmaceutical companies.  The drug companies don&#8217;t want a cure.  They want money.  And the most money is in chemotherapy and cancer pain management.  Imagine the hit pain management and disease management drug sales would have taken if the age of  immunotherapy would have begun.</p>
<p>All of the big pharmaceutical companies are aware of Dendreon. In the weeks before the FDA decision, witness the Bristol Meyers head of research saying Provenge would never be approved.  Bristol Meyers has a cancer treatment franchise.  Dendreon can advance cancer treatment by miles, possibly curing many men of PC and eventually curing many people of cancer with its platform. Companies like Bristol Meyers and investors like Howard Scher do not want to see Dendreon succeed.  Unfortunately, there are a lot of companies like Bristol Meyers and doctor-investors like Scher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brange</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>brange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Bulls eye!  This hits the intended target dead on.  The MOA might be based on conjecture, but it is inspired conjecture and is incredibly effective</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bulls eye!  This hits the intended target dead on.  The MOA might be based on conjecture, but it is inspired conjecture and is incredibly effective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2007-11-15/sleepless-in-asentar/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I am still amazed and puzzled that something this criminal could be orchestrated by our own goverment agency and the doctors that have taken the oath to help patients. Such an travesty will never stand in the land of free. Truth will be revealed and these criminal elements will face justice. Clean up this corrupt agency called FDA immediately and approve Provenge now so that the PC patients can be saved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still amazed and puzzled that something this criminal could be orchestrated by our own goverment agency and the doctors that have taken the oath to help patients. Such an travesty will never stand in the land of free. Truth will be revealed and these criminal elements will face justice. Clean up this corrupt agency called FDA immediately and approve Provenge now so that the PC patients can be saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
