ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge
August 14th, 2010 | Posted by CTLIn case you missed it, the American Society of Clinical Oncologists (ASCO) wrote to CMS in support of Provenge. Here is what Dr. Allen Lichter, the CEO of ASCO, posted on the Medicare website:
Dear Drs. Paserchia and Fitterman:
On behalf of our 28,000 members who treat people
with cancer, the American Society of Clinical
Oncology (ASCO) is writing to express concern
about a recent action taken by the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
On June 30, 2010, CMS opened an internally-
generated national coverage analysis (NCA) of
sipuleucel-T (Provenge®). Although we commend
CMS for taking steps to gather scientific
information about new cancer therapies, the
information provided by CMS regarding this NCA
lacks sufficient clarity regarding the purposes
underlying this action. In particular, we are
concerned that CMS may have plans to examine the
issue of whether to cover this therapy for its
FDA-approved indications. If that is the case,
this would be both counter-productive and ill-
advised. We believe that CMS is required by the
Social Security Act to cover drugs and biologics
for FDA-approved indications used in anticancer
chemotherapeutic regimens.
Since 1993, section 1861(t)(2)(A) of the Medicare
statute has provided a definition for drugs and
biologicals covered by the Medicare program that
explicitly includes those for use “in an
anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen for a
medically accepted indication. ” The statute
further defines “medically accepted indication”
to include “any use which has been approved by
the Food and Drug Administration” in 1861(t)(2)
(B). The statute thus clearly envisions that
Medicare coverage for cancer drugs will flow from
approval by FDA, and CMS has historically
followed this practice.
We urge CMS to withdraw the current NCA and look
for other means of communication to gather
information about this therapy, such as a
potential meeting with scientific experts to
address specific questions or a meeting of the
MedCAC (conducted outside of the context of an
NCA) to address specific questions. We
appreciate the longstanding and positive working
relationship that ASCO maintains with officials
throughout CMS, and we hope that you will
continue to look to ASCO and our members for
scientific and clinical expertise on this and
future issues.
Under any scenario, we urge CMS to provide clear
public statements regarding Medicare’s current
policies governing the coverage of this therapy
and to address the issue of how any potential
future changes in coverage policies at the local
or national levels could impact individuals who
might be mid-therapy. In practice, ambiguity and
uncertainty regarding coverage policies can act
as an unacceptable barrier to medically necessary
care.
Please do not hesitate to contact ASCO with any
scientific, clinical or administrative questions
involving cancer care provided in community-based
and other settings.
http://www.cms.gov/mcd/viewpubliccomments.asp?id=&cov_id=&state_id=&list_type=&goto=viewpubliccomment&nca_id=247
Popularity: 83%
Tags: ASCO, Breast Cancer, cancer, CMS, Dendreon, FDA, Healthcare, Medicare, Prostate Cancer, provenge

August 14th, 2010 at 1:23 pm
[…] Adres URL: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge | CareToLive […]
August 14th, 2010 at 7:39 pm
Why haven’t you guys started a petition yet for immediate CMS coverage. Am I the only one who thinks the one year delay is unethical? I am afraid that this delay will cost lives and cause individuals to suffer needlessly. CMS covers chemo, which has less of a survival advantage and far more side effects and ends up costing the patient more for a far worse quality of life. I don”t know why there isn’t more public outrage or Congressional action regarding this. Where is the outrage for the administration not supporting revolutionary cutting edge treatments creating American jobs that lead to quality of life increases. It is one thing to initiate a NCD for a treatment after several years on the market and data questions effectiveness, but to initiate a NCD before a first of its kind American-made cancer vaccine has had any time to show real data after FDA approval (after showing great efficacy during the FDA trials, with minimal side effects) is unconscionable - I can’t think of anything worse to chill medical breakthroughs, quality of life increases for the American population, as well as investments by American biotechs. Sorry for the rant, but am I the only one this concerned about CMS inquiry? Even if the ultimate result is full approval, the delay does enough damage to the American biotech industry and investment in cutting edge American companies (not to mention costing lives) that it is unethical.
August 15th, 2010 at 12:12 am
[…] here: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge | CareToLive Share and […]
August 15th, 2010 at 6:26 pm
The ASCO letter was good and urged withdrawal of the NCS, but this was right on point:
http://www.accc-cancer.org/advocacy/pdf/2010_Comments_NCAProstate.pdf
August 25th, 2010 at 2:32 pm
[…] ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge | CareToLive […]