<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge</title>
	<link>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/</link>
	<description>CareToLive &#124; Help Men With Late Stage Prostate Cancer &#124; Provenge Now!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 07:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is a Cure in Sight?Melanoma. . Jim Breitfeller &#124; Melanoma Blog</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17335</link>
		<dc:creator>Is a Cure in Sight?Melanoma. . Jim Breitfeller &#124; Melanoma Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17335</guid>
		<description>[...] ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge &#124; CareToLive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge | CareToLive [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sanders</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17241</guid>
		<description>The ASCO letter was good and urged withdrawal of the NCS, but this was right on point:

http://www.accc-cancer.org/advocacy/pdf/2010_Comments_NCAProstate.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ASCO letter was good and urged withdrawal of the NCS, but this was right on point:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.accc-cancer.org/advocacy/pdf/2010_Comments_NCAProstate.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.accc-cancer.org/advocacy/pdf/2010_Comments_NCAProstate.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge &#124; CareToLive &#124; www.ardelahlam.com</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17231</link>
		<dc:creator>ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge &#124; CareToLive &#124; www.ardelahlam.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 07:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17231</guid>
		<description>[...] here: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge &#124; CareToLive   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] here: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge | CareToLive   Share and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sanders</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17229</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 02:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17229</guid>
		<description>Why haven't you guys started a petition yet for immediate CMS coverage.  Am I the only one who thinks the one year delay is unethical?  I am afraid that this delay will cost lives and cause individuals to suffer needlessly.  CMS covers chemo, which has less of a survival advantage and far more side effects and ends up costing the patient more for a far worse quality of life.  I don"t know why there isn't more public outrage or Congressional action regarding this.  Where is the outrage for the administration not supporting revolutionary cutting edge treatments creating American jobs that lead to quality of life increases.  It is one thing to initiate a NCD for a treatment after several years on the market and data questions effectiveness, but to initiate a NCD before a first of its kind American-made cancer vaccine has had any time to show real data after FDA approval (after showing great efficacy during the FDA trials, with minimal side effects) is unconscionable - I can't think of anything worse to chill medical breakthroughs, quality of life increases for the American population, as well as investments by American biotechs.  Sorry for the rant, but am I the only one this concerned about CMS inquiry?  Even if the ultimate result is full approval, the delay does enough damage to the American biotech industry and investment in cutting edge American companies (not to mention costing lives) that it is unethical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why haven&#8217;t you guys started a petition yet for immediate CMS coverage.  Am I the only one who thinks the one year delay is unethical?  I am afraid that this delay will cost lives and cause individuals to suffer needlessly.  CMS covers chemo, which has less of a survival advantage and far more side effects and ends up costing the patient more for a far worse quality of life.  I don&#8221;t know why there isn&#8217;t more public outrage or Congressional action regarding this.  Where is the outrage for the administration not supporting revolutionary cutting edge treatments creating American jobs that lead to quality of life increases.  It is one thing to initiate a NCD for a treatment after several years on the market and data questions effectiveness, but to initiate a NCD before a first of its kind American-made cancer vaccine has had any time to show real data after FDA approval (after showing great efficacy during the FDA trials, with minimal side effects) is unconscionable - I can&#8217;t think of anything worse to chill medical breakthroughs, quality of life increases for the American population, as well as investments by American biotechs.  Sorry for the rant, but am I the only one this concerned about CMS inquiry?  Even if the ultimate result is full approval, the delay does enough damage to the American biotech industry and investment in cutting edge American companies (not to mention costing lives) that it is unethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge &#124; CareToLive &#171; cms</title>
		<link>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17225</link>
		<dc:creator>ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge &#124; CareToLive &#171; cms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caretolive.com/2010-08-14/asco-tells-cms-it-should-cover-provenge/#comment-17225</guid>
		<description>[...] Adres URL: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge &#124; CareToLive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Adres URL: ASCO Tells CMS It Should Cover Provenge | CareToLive [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

