When looking at The Freedom of Information Act [5 USCS § 552], notice what it states in Section 3:

B) Each agency shall make reasonable efforts to maintain its records in forms or formats that are reproducible for purposes of this section.

C) In responding under this paragraph to a request for records, an agency shall make reasonable efforts to search for the records in electronic  form or format, except when such efforts would significantly interfere with the operation of the agency’s automated information system.

(D) For purposes of this paragraph, the term “search” means to review, manually or by automated means, agency records for the purpose of locating those records which are responsive to a request.

The FDA responded to this by saying such a search for documents sent to and from Richard Pazdur would be complex. Then the FDA mistakenly told the court that such a request would be too costly, not realizing the requester pays for it.  After the search was completed, Richard Pazdur simply declared that he deleted and shredded the documents two years ago and CareToLive had to pay 40 cents for this complex search! 40 cents!

You can’t even purchase one of these for 40 cents!

Sadly, the Court in the Southern District of Ohio ruled in favor of FDA.

CareToLive’s fine attorney, Kerry M. Donahue, filed an appeal this past August and last night he filed our Appellate brief (Appellant’s brief) which is our written argument for the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals which they will review and then probably set up for oral argument.

The FDA (Appellee) has 15 days to file their response, but we would not be surprised if they get an extra 2 weeks after that if they need it.

You can read the brief here>>   ctlappealfoia11172009pdf.pdf

Here are some highlights:

“The Appelle has consistently argued that the Provenge matter is still an “ongoing process” so the destruction of documents regarding an ongoing process demands further inquiry.“

“Either way the FDA did not perform the “complex” search that it promised the Court and Appellant that it was conducting.”

“The search time incurred by the FDA CDER division FOIA office was so slight that it did not even register on the radar as a significant reportable/billable search time. That was the entire “complexity” of the search and response.”

“…the FDA told inquiring members of Congress that they did in fact conduct an internal investigation.”

” It does not cost the Defendant anything!“

Popularity: 16%

On November 2, 2009 the Dendreon Corporation announced it had completed the submission of the amended Biologics License Application (BLA) for Provenge, also known as sipuleucel-T, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Dendreon is seeking licensure for PROVENGE for men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). When approved by the FDA, PROVENGE would represent the first product in the new therapeutic class known as active cellular immunotherapies.

By December 25, 2009, CareToLive expects to see FDA approve Provenge based on FDA’s response to CTL’s Citizens Petition.

Dendreon presented the original BLA to the FDA in March, 2007. The FDA granted it Fast Track Status and Priority Review. FDA then used our tax dollars to assemble a panel of experts to advise them at an Advisory Committee hearing. That panel stated Provenge is safe by a vote of 17-0 and that Provenge showed substantial evidence of efficacy by a vote of 13-4. Two weeks after that panel recommended approval, some conflicted doctors who were worried about competitive Phase II treatments they were working on and what investors thought while having their own investments riding on the final FDA decision, lobbied the FDA to delay approval. After three letters were leaked, which showed collusion with some doctors at NCI, FDA denied approval on May 8, 2007. Among the leaked letters was a statement by NCI saying it did not support Provenge, rather it had a robust portfolio which included support for the competitive Phase II treatments mentioned above.

Dendreon proceeded with its IMPACT trial. In October, 2008, an Independent Data Monitoring Committee reported that the interim data showed Provenge had a safe profile and a 20% survival advantage over placebo. The FDA stood idly by and ignored this data which supported the original BLA.

On April 14, 2009, Dendreon announced Provenge significantly prolongs survival in men with advanced prostate cancer. The final data showed once again a safe profile and the survival advantage was now at 22.5%. To put that in perspective, 96,000 men in the United States have advanced prostate cancer, 30,000 of them will die. 22.5% of 30,000 means 6,750 lives would be saved. The FDA continues to stand coldheartedly by.

CareToLive continues to challenge the FDA. It still seeks FOIA documents from NCI and FDA. A senior official at the FDA, Richard Pazdur, declared he deleted and shredded those documents. With men’s lives hanging in the balance, our government agencies should not be participating in such shenanigans. CTL will hold FDA to its words.

When FDA responded to the CTL Citizens Petition, it said three times it would expeditiously review the data. We are holding them to it.

http://caretolive.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/fda-response-to-citizens-petition.pdf

                                          FDA Statement To CTL On May 21, 2009

Page 1:
“We are committed to expeditiously reviewing the new information as soon as it is submitted. FDA shares the goal of approving new products, such as Provenge, as soon as they are shown to be safe and effective.”

Page 3:
“We look forward to receiving this information and are committed to expeditiously reviewing the new study data upon submission.”

Page 14:
“We remain committed to working with Dendreon to facilitate its activities in pursuit of licensure for Provenge. We look forward to receiving Dendreon’s amendment to its existing BLA so that we may review this information expeditiously.”

On page 13 of their response, FDA said this: “FDA shares the concerns raised by CTL regarding the need for treatment options for advanced prostate cancer. The agency has implemented programs designed to expedite the review and approval of promising new treatments for cancer and other life-threatening diseases, and continues to work to improve those programs.”

“FDA has deep sympathy for the plight of patients who have exhausted their treatment options, but Congress requires FDA to make approval decisions based solely upon scientific data.”

CareToLive tried to get Congress to investigate the shenanigans surrounding the FDA’s handling of the original Provenge BLA. All Congress had to do was drag Matt Herper from Forbes into the chambers and ask him about this:

“But right now, its stock is dangerous to buy, because its fate will be determined by unpredictable politics at the Food and Drug Administration, not the certainties of science.”

http://www.forbes.com/2007/04/20/prostate-dendreon-stock-biz-cx_mh_0420dendreon.html

In addition, Congress could have called in Allison Martin from NCI as she helped write one of the leaked letters, or Richard Pazdur, who was seen passing notes at the Advisory Committee hearing and was said to be ready to throw a tizzy fit if Provenge was approved back in May 2007.

Congress could have called in Howard Scher who was worried about Dendreon investors and competitive Phase II trials for treatments he was working on, investing in and advising others to invest in.

Congress should still investigate this travesty. Here is some more information that can put them on the right track:

http://www.deepcapture.com/michael-milken-60000-deaths-and-the-story-of-dendreon/

CTL expects FDA to right most of this by Christmas Day, 2009.

Hey FDA, get Provenge to the dying men! Right away! Right now!

Popularity: 19%

CareToLive attorney, Kerry M. Donahue, filed a motion on Monday, October 26, 2009, in the Sixth Circuit Court of the United States, asking the Court to allow leave to supplement the FOIA appeal record with previous documents, numbers 3, 20 and 29 from Southern District of Ohio case no. 07-729 CareToLive vs. von Eschenbach.

CareToLive was concerned about the possible destruction of documents by FDA employee Richard Pazdur so we filed a motion to preserve documents (document 3). Upon Pazdur’s discovery that the documents were being sought, he deleted the documents.

The Court denied that motion but verbally instructed FDA counsel to instruct its clients not to destroy any documents involved in pending litigation. Well that client did indeed destroy the documents and the lower Court denied the request by Appellant to obtain the date of the computer deletion of the records by the FDA.

Richard Pazdur of the FDA possessed said documents, both hard copies and electronically on his FDA computer. The affidavit from Richard Pazdur further indicates that the documents are now unavailable because the electronic copies were deleted and the hard copies were shredded, by him.

Kerry also writes in the motion for CareToLive, available here Motion To Supplement, that despite the lack of any reasonable search for the documents by Appellee and despite the lower Courts repeated refusal to allow discovery on the issue and without the lower Court even allowing Appellant the full opportunity to be heard, the District Court denied the Civil Rule 56(f) motion of Appellant and declined to allow even minimal discovery and a full response to Defendant-Appellee’s motion for Summary Judgment, which would have been appropriate based on the particular facts of this case.

These three documents, numbers 3, 20 and 29, are very important to the brief and oral arguments to be presented to this Court. Let’s hope the Sixth Circuit Court agrees and we can get to the real reason why Richard Pazdur stopped a safe, non-toxic treatment that extends survival from reaching men who were dying and had no other treatment options. Check back here as we will report on this case as it moves through the Court of Appeals.

Popularity: 18%

The NY Times just released an article showing what a great guy Richard Pazdur is. This caused me to revisit journalistic integrity. The reason I did that is because I am going to present some rather harsh information about Richard Pazdur that this NY Times reporter, Gardiner Harris, refused to address. It appears to me that this reporter is a friend of Pazdur and this precludes him from maintaining journalistic integrity. This NY Times reporter will insult patient advocates while standing up for a guy who is supposed to be the ultimate patient advocate, a doctor.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/16/health/policy/16cancer.html?_r=1

The preamble for The Society of Professional Journalists states:

Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty.

Please note: Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. It does not say to serve government employees and, in particular, doctors who work for the FDA, a government agency.

On its website, the New York Time states:

For more than a century The New York Times Company has stood for quality, integrity and distinguished journalism.

Will it remain standing for quality, integrity and distinguished journalism? The NY Times says readers dissatisfied with a response or concerned about the paper’s journalistic integrity may reach the public editor at public@nytimes.com or (212) 556-7652.

As you read the article penned in favor of Richard Pazdur, while denouncing those who protested against him, notice what is left out rather than what is puffed in. Why didn’t Gardiner mention Provenge or ImClone, two big blemishes on Richard Pazdur’s resume? Richard Pazdur is a conflicted liar. We the people should not have to see our tax dollars go to such a manipulator who pretends to be a doctor. He wouldn’t know the Hippocratic Oath if you smacked him over the head with it.

A good way to test the character of a doctor is to watch how he or she reacts in an emergency room. People are rushed to emergency room for many life threatening problems. The good doctors and nurses spring into action trying everything they can to save a life. Richard Pazdur does not react that way. In 2002, he leaked inside FDA information, which Gardiner is correct to point out is against the law, to a powerful Bristol-Myers Squibb lobbyist so he could get it into the hands of Paul Goldberg, who just happens to share tables at conferences with Richard Pazdur and this NY Times reporter, Gardiner Harris. This kept an effective treatment from reaching dying patients.

In 2007, Richard Pazdur raised his ugly head again and stopped a safe and effective, non-evasive, non-toxic prostate cancer treatment called Provenge from reaching 96,000 eligible men. The men had no other option. They had a quick destiny with death. Paul Goldberg assisted Pazdur with his non-peer reviewed medical publication called the Cancer Letter. Together, they leaked three letters that were supposed to be confidential. Why didn’t Gardiner Harris include this in his article? Continue Reading IT’S ALWAYS GOOD TO HAVE FRIENDS IN THE NEWSPAPER BUSINESS »

Popularity: 17%

In Memoriam: August 24, 2009
Remembering Bruce Tower

On September 17th, 2007, I arrived at JJ Muldoon’s Pub in Gaithersburg Maryland around 9 PM. Before too long, I heard the thunderous voice of a distinguished looking gentleman. He was being escorted to a mini-van by a woman whom I found out was one of our heroines, Melody Davis. Many around them were making a fuss. As the word spread the atmosphere became electrifying. It’s when we all realized who this man was.

Bruce, suffering from late stage prostate cancer, was not in the best physical condition, but he nonetheless made the trip to Maryland to help us protest the next day outside the FDA Headquarters in Rockville. His gut-wrenching speech captured the audience and delivered the message. Many men, like him, need Provenge NOW. They could be strengthening their immune system, fighting the awful disease we know as prostate cancer.

On a Sunday afternoon in April 2008, I spoke to Bruce on the phone. We chatted a bit and then we discussed our fight for Provenge. It was almost a year now and he was willing to keep fighting right along with us. He gave us permission to use his picture and he wrote a letter which we published as an ad in the Rockville Gazette. It is a sad statement to say we had to pay a lot of money to get the story in the local newspaper in the hometown of the FDA. Several times he appeared on the Andrew Schorr Patient Power radio show with us. He and his wife Carol were there whenever we needed their help.

(click to enlarge)

Week 2 Ad Color caretoliverockvillegazette2ad.pdf

http://caretolive.com/2008-04-09/caretolive-continues-its-in-your-face-ad-campaign-asking-the-fda-to-approve-provenge-for-prostate-cancer-now/

In his letter, Bruce made a simple plea. “Here is my plea; FDA: Please approve Provenge NOW.”

He could have had it working in his body for over two years. Now he will never get the chance to try Provenge to fight for his life.

I can hardly type this now because I just learned we lost Bruce Tower. The emotions run strong. Sadness for Bruce’s family. Anger for the FDA playing the wrong kind of god and withholding a safe and effective treatment. From everything I learned about Bruce, he was a remarkable man, dedicated to his wife, children and grandchildren. He inspired and taught other kids as a soccer coach. He led by example. He was a fine citizen indeed.

From everything I learned about our modern day government, these self-serving fools in charge could basically not give a damn. They are out of touch. They lost control. They are driving a long train full of people to their death tricking them into thinking they are going over a bridge. I can tell you with certainty, there is no bridge.

The empty promises of Andrew von Eschenbach and the nerve of him, makes my blood run cold with contempt. To me, he is the epitome of the captured FDA as declared by Harry Markopolis. To me, he let his friendship with convicted felon Michael Milken ruin his objective mission to serve the American people. Von Eschenbach double-dipped with the FDA and NCI leadership. He already set the Conflict of Interest stage. How could he keep an eye on it when he was wallowing in it?

Poor Bruce and his family. They should have had better. Their goverment let them down. They paid their taxes for nothing, not to mention the pain Bruce endured in his final days. I heard Bruce handled it like the champion he is. He only wanted to see those around him smile and live the good life.

May God richly reward you, Bruce. You should hear those words of old, “Well done my good and faithful servant.” May God comfort your family. May you rest in peace.

Popularity: 20%

What made me sickest over the Larry King show on prostate cancer was in the beginning of the show, when Larry King stated something along the lines that if they find the cure for prostate cancer they just might have to name it or call it the Milken cure. That set the tone for the show and the angle he was playing.

Larry King lost most of his fortune not too many years ago flipping insurance policy’s under the advice of some scammers. It worked well until he found out he was the mark. To recover, it looks like he went with Madoff, where he was once again taken to the cleaners. In Milken he finally found someone with juice. The show was packed with the mutual admiration society. Milken is doing his image rehabilitation desperately seeking a pardon. Maybe Larry will have Kerry on next (I can dream).

Larry King, Mike Milken, John McEnroe, Colin Powell, Joe Torre, Rudolph Guiliani, a cast of big mouths with not one word to say about Provenge. They are a sickening, pathetic bunch. We know Larry knows about Provenge because many of our friends and members reached out to Larry in the past and more recently before the show. Now if I were a conspiracy theorist…

They never mentioned Provenge, a non toxic, non invasive safe and effective immunotherapy that harnesses and enhances your own healthy cells to fight your own prostate cancer cells. Some men with late stage pc are living 8 years later. 1 in 6 men will get prostate cancer in their lifetime.

Provenge should be on the market by next year, in spite of Milken. His chairman, Howard Scher of the Prostate Cancer Foundation Therapeutic Consortium, and Milken’s recently departed CEO, Alison Martin of the Melanoma Research Alliance, colluded on the leaked letters that stopped Provenge dead in its tracks from reaching the 69,000+ men who have died since May 2007.

Mark Mitchell of Deep Capture recently published an exposé about Milken’s part in the death of 60,000 men and the delay of Provenge. The complete story of Dendreon is now available  21 August 2009
Read the full story

The PCF is also trying to take credit for financing Provenge? It stated this because it sent some money to the University of San Francisco back in the year 2000 for Eric Small to work on immunotherapy. In 2006 Small wrote a rather positive article stating Provenge may work. In 2007 Howie Scher and Alison Martin used that 2006 abstract against Provenge highlighting the word “may” as to say it may not work. PCF cannot take credit here. It can take credit for two of its big shots stopping Provenge which had positive Phase III trials under its belt while Asentar, Abiraterone and GVAX, treatments the PCF touted, were only finished with Phase II trials.

Furthermore, in the 2005 PCF Annual Report, Novacea and Cougar did not give any money to PCF. Dendreon donated between $25k to $50K. Cell Genesis gave between $10K to $25K.

Not only did the PCF do nothing to push for Provenge approval, they actually accepted money from Dendreon to support the PCF. It should have been the other way around. Dendreon was struggling for every dollar it could muster, and must have felt it had to make a donation to PCF too! Something stinks in the world of Milken’s philanthropy and I can smell it all the way in New Jersey.

Continue Reading Hey Larry King! Do your homework!! »

Popularity: 19%

Hold the deck.

It’s certainly okay to have the opinion that the FDA made a reasonable choice at the time it denied approval to Provenge in 2007. It’s not the right opinion, but it is a defendable one. It is not all right, based on what we now know, to say they made the right decision.

On the other hand:

That the Provenge BLA was not afforded proper due process is an absolute. Because it clearly was not afforded proper due process nobody can say with any certainty that the FDA made a reasonable decision. Once the process is corrupted it’s all guesswork from there. Nobody knows for sure the extent of influences and back room shenanigans that occurred to assure that Provenge was not fairly evaluated. When CareToLive through litigation and FOIA’s tried to get information they were stymied by the FDA who went to great lengths to avoid any transparency on the issue.

There are aces scattered all over the floor at the FDA and a couple sticking out of a few sleeves so how can the game have been fairly played? Is it too much to ask for a fair game? The denial of a fair PROCESS is the one truth that the FDA could have, should have, admitted.

If that process occurred in a court room there would, at a minimum, have been declared a mistrial, when the evidence of such became known (which was made known to the FDA by petition, litigation and of course lots of letters).

That they did not make a reasonable and common sense decision based on the class of patients for which Provenge was seeking approval, or conduct a proper risk/benefit analysis with a focus on the fact that the treatment was destined for late stage patients is clear.

The FDA said two things that support this; One was that the minority voices on the AC panel were taken into consideration as a factor in the decision making process, and Two is that Richard Pazdur of CDER influenced that process. Top that off with an FDA commissioner who just happens to be a very good friend of Milken……

I don’t want the point to be lost that it is the position of CareToLive that there is no way anyone can say a reasonable decision was made, because the process was completely corrupted. CareToLive has sought accountability and transparency to determine in what ways the process fell short. If the FDA would show us the process then we might be persuaded otherwise. Until then and even because of the cover up itself, it has to be evaluated based on what we know.

The cover up and the lack of transparency is indicative that the FDA made a choice that transparency would make matters worse in this case. Otherwise, why fight so hard to keep the process from the public eye.

What other influences entered into the picture. Political pressure? Milken pressure? Financial pressure? Inside power struggles? Some or all of the above?

The deck was stacked. The dice were loaded. Everybody knows!

With all that you now know about Milken and the depths of his depravity, does it not trouble you that he had considerable control and influence over at least Scher, Martin and von Eschenbach if not others? Continue Reading American Hold ‘Em »

Popularity: 20%

Michael Milken, 60,000 Deaths, and the Story of Dendreon (Chapter 1 of 15)

18 June 2009 by Mark Mitchell

What follows is part 1 of a 15 part series. The remaining installments will appear on Deep Capture over the next several weeks, after which point the story will be published in its entirety. It is a story about the travails of just one small company, but it describes market machinations that have affected hundreds of other companies, and it contains a larger message for anyone concerned about the “deep capture” of our nation’s media and regulatory bodies.

This story, like too many others, begins with Jim Cramer, the CNBC personality, making “a mistake.”

On September 26, 2005, Cramer  announced to his television audience the sad news (punctuated by funny sound effects – a clown horn, a crashing airplane) that Provenge, an experimental treatment for prostate cancer, had flopped. Thousands of end-stage patients had been pinning their hopes on Provenge, but according to Cramer the treatment had just been rejected by the Food & Drug Administration. It would never go to market.

Read It Here >>http://www.deepcapture.com/michael-milken-60000-deaths-and-the-story-of-dendreon/

http://www.DeepCapture.com

http://www.deepcapture.com/michael-milken-60000-deaths-and-the-story-of-dendreon-chapter-1-of-15/

Popularity: 25%

The FDA blew a golden opportunity.

It took them 2 years of foot dragging to reach their decision on our CareToLive Citizens’ Petition.

They DENIED it!

The only redeeming factor in their pages of excuses, is that the FDA stated 3 times that they will process the amended Dendreon BLA expeditiously.

We at CTL feel the FDA lacks the compassion and the scientific ability to evaluate our Petition.

With the stellar Provenge survival data recently exhibited, we believe the FDA should have immediately reconsidered their death rattle.

Apr 28, 2009
Data Presented at AUA Demonstrate PROVENGE Significantly Prolongs Survival for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer in Pivotal Phase 3 IMPACT Study (LINK)

The dysfunctional, omnipotent FDA has spoken loudly and clearly to the men with late stage prostate cancer who are out of options.

You can’t have a safe and effective immunotherapy yet.

Go home and die!

You can read the FDA’s response here >> fda-response-to-citizens-petition.pdf

Here are some of our thoughts on the FDA response. We welcome your comments.

Before addressing the specific requests in your petition, we first want to make it clear that we share your concern for men suffering from advanced prostate cancer.

Too many men continue dying a painful death while the FDA continues to stonewall the approval of Provenge by not addressing the deception that took place during the Provenge approval process.

We are committed to expeditiously reviewing the new information as soon as it is submitted.

This was the only good thing we read in their response.

PLEASE HURRY.

THIS IS AN EMERGENCY!

FDA shares the goal of approving new products, such as Provenge, as soon as they are shown to be safe and effective.

Provenge has shown all along that it is safe and effective. The Advisory Committee questions are regulatory questions.

Is it safe?

Is there substantial evidence of efficacy?

The panel voted overwhelmingly that it is safe and effective.

The FDA response tried to gloss over the conspiracy and conflict-of-interest issues, simply denying them without offering any evidence.

The agency lied when it said Provenge didn’t slow progression in either 9901 or 9902A. The correct terminology would have been “did not slow progression with statistical significance.”

We think that 11.7 weeks vs. 10.0 weeks in the 9901 trial is evidence of slowed progression.

A p value of 0.052 (Journal of Clinical Oncology number) or 0.085 (FDA number) should not be taken lightly, even if it did barely miss statistical significance.

Combine that with the survival p value of 0.01, and that’s pretty convincing evidence that 9901 was a successful trial.

It is a lie that Provenge did not slow progression in 9901, and it is a lie that there is no positive correlation between progression (91.5-94.8%) and survival (99.0%). The FDA’s progression argument is a LIE.

FDA has a long history of permitting access to investigational drugs to treat serious and immediately life-threatening diseases without adequate available therapies. Individuals can obtain access by enrolling in on-going clinical investigations of such products, including any existing expanded access protocols.

Continue Reading FDA LIES & DENIES — CARE TO LIVE CRIES »

Popularity: 19%

Seems there is no moving forward without moving backwards, as much as moving forward would be the right thing for everyone to do. The FDA won’t allow us to move forward so we must forever walk them through the sins of the past. The FDA dooms themselves to forever be walked through events of the past, events of the present, and events of the future.

While they have the power to end it happily like good old Ebenezer, and to help Tiny Tim (Teddy), they choose to let it end without redemption for themselves. Ebenezer Scrooge epitomizes the current FDA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qY2TT_aj_Fw&feature=fvsr

First, today, we visit the Provenge of May’s gone past.

As you know shortly after the FDA announced that they were not going to approve Provenge in May 2007 advocates met with then commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach to discuss the mistake the FDA had made in denying the BLA for Provenge and not allowing late stage prostate cancer patients to have Provenge.

It appeared that absent from the group of advocates at that meeting was anyone from the Prostate Cancer Foundation. However, unbeknownst to the advocates there meeting with Dr. von Eschenbach, the Prostate Cancer Foundation was in fact there. The problem was they were there on the other side.

The Prostate Cancer Foundation had and has the ear of former commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. It is now crystal clear that if they would have gone they would have been sitting on von Eschenbach’s side of the table. Since the Commissioner has left the FDA, CareToLive has requested his help and he has declined (that request was renewed after the data came in).

The advocates at the advocacy meeting might not have seen it in Andy’s eyes but in them were, Michael Milken, Jonathan Simons and Stuart Holden all from the PCF.

They had and have the ear of Dr. von Eschenbach. What good could it do for the advocates to meet with Andy von Eschenbach when the largest prostate cancer patient advocacy group was absent and was in fact telling von Eshenbach to do the opposite that the advocates at the meeting were advocating for? Did those advocates know that they were speaking to the commissioner and the PCF? It’s kind of like the old poker adage; if you are sitting at a poker table and you don’t know who the sucker is, it’s you. The chair that spoke loudest was the chair that sat empty. When is the PCF going to pull up its chair to the right side of the table?

Thy enemy has shown thyself and that enemy is within the advocacy groups themselves. In deference to Michael’s love for baseball: Does anyone doubt that if the PCF would just step up to the plate and call for accelerated approval they could hit a home run.

In September of 2007 on behalf of CareToLive I sent a letter to Michael Milken by regular U.S. mail seeking his support for the effort to make Provenge available to late stage prostate cancer patients. That letter was never responded to.

Aren’t Mr. Milken and his groups in favor of speedier approval and access to treatments for late stage disease when the patients are without good alternatives?

Michael Milken founded the group Faster Cures which has shown no indication that it is in fact willing to support getting treatments such as Provenge to the patients faster.

Mike Milken says:

FasterCures

This Washington, D.C.-based think tank is removing barriers to progress against all life-threatening diseases.

The FasterCures team is dedicated to saving lives by saving time.
Milken Institute

Mike and his Faster Cures both remain MIA!!

More importantly, the greatest scientific achievement in late stage prostate cancer treatment in modern history and the PCF does nothing to help groups like CareToLive and others to try and speed it to the patients. If not now when? They have no right to call themselves prostate cancer patient advocates. Since the new data was announced CareToLive again sought the assistance of the multimillion dollar funded Prostate Cancer Foundation. These requests have repeatedly been made by CareToLive and they have repeatedly been ignored by the largest, most powerful and influential prostate cancer advocacy group first made in 2007 and then later made by request at the April 24th 2009 PCF round table in Washington D.C. and then later made by e-mails and finally culminating in the open letter sent by e-mail and regular U.S. mail to PCF CEO Jonathan Simons.

Soon after the advocates meeting with Dr. von Eschenbach after the Provenge denial in 2007 came this event:

Los Angeles, 2007 Milken Institute Global Conference
Building a Food and Drug Administration for the 21st Century

Moderator:
Greg Simon, President, FasterCures/The Center for Accelerating Medical Solutions

Panelists:
David Gratzer, Senior Fellow, Center for Medical Progress, Manhattan Institute
Andrew von Eschenbach, Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Greg Simon, President of FasterCures/The Center for Accelerating Medical Solutions and panel moderator began by asking how we can take the FDA we have today and get to the one we need for the 21st century. Andrew von Eschenbach, Commissioner of the FDA said, “in essence, the FDA is an information management business, and the world around us is changing fast and the data is changing also.” Personalized medicine will fundamentally change how the FDA approaches its work and how it is organized and the types of skill sets employees need. Dr. von Eschenbach talked about how science has crossed the threshold where diseases can be viewed through a molecular prism. “This doesn’t have to be about the science of safety or efficacy, with new molecular medicine we can have both,” he pointed out.

Balancing patient safety with access will be critical. “We have these discussions and a lot of time is spent on safety but we need to be sure we have an innovative drug market,” offered David Gratzer, Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Moving towards a “lifecycle approach” at the FDA that balances safety and access is critical and was a key message of the 2006 Institute of Medicine study on drug safety.

Beth Seidenberg, Partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers pointed out that the future is now. Programs at the FDA like the Critical Path Initiative need even more support and resources. “We need to give the FDA the tools, people, and money to ensure the agency can take advantage of these scientific advances.” A system of integrated medical information based on electronic health records and data sharing will allow for more streamlined post-marketing surveillance and will get the FDA away from paper to electronic files. Resources and systems change are needed to advance these IT systems at the agency. “We need to get around the proprietary relationship to data and see that having access to large population data sets is the only way to advance.”

When Greg Simon asked each panelist to name the most important next step for the agency two themes emerged: getting the agency more resources and the creation of a creative strategic plan that embraces the possibility of how personalized medicine can change how we currently approve drugs.

Andy also says:
http://www.mikemilken.com/videos.taf?video=6&type=wmp

Mr. Milken and the PCF: Today there are an estimated 10 million cancer survivors just in America alone — men and women who in many cases have life expectancies measured in months, not years. “Many would gladly enlist as foot soldiers in an effort to help cure a disease that in many cases will be genetically passed on to their children and grandchildren.”

* “Cancer researchers, clinicians, and patient advocates rarely speak with one voice on any subject related to the disease. They fight over funding priorities; they squabble over treatment options; they joust over the relevance of biological discoveries. But virtually everyone agrees that Milken deserves an enormous share of the credit for the progress made against this major killer. ‘Mike’s done more for prostate cancer research than anyone in America,’ says one of the nation’s best-known prostate surgeons, Patrick Walsh, head of urology at Johns Hopkins.”
* ” ‘Michael Milken changed the culture of [medical] research,’ says Andrew von Eschenbach, director of the National Cancer Institute. ‘He created a sense of urgency that focused on results and shortened the timeline. It took a business mindset to shake things up. What he’s done is now the model.’”

* ” ‘Michael is always thinking creatively,’ says [Dr. Leroy] Hood, sounding like a convert. ‘He transformed how you do research in the field of prostate cancer and how you think about aggressively going after a disease. It has been a real revolution.’ ”

Mr. Milken, Mr. Simons we want to speak with one voice, why won’t you return our call?

Why won’t you respond to our e-mails?

Why won’t you help us to help late stage cancer patients now?

Where is the disagreement with regards to Provenge and WHY won’t you help?

So you backed the wrong horse but there is still time to change your bets, still time to turn the cart upright, still time to wipe that egg off your face and move forward.

HELP!!!!!

Here is what the PCF as a group says:

Although there has been dramatic progress in finding better treatments, the impending increase in incidence makes the need greater than ever. Fortunately, recent advances in science have made the opportunities greater than ever as well. With your support, we will be able to pursue more of these opportunities and hasten the day when prostate cancer is merely a sad memory.

Hey PCF, why won’t you give us a straight answer on our call for helping Provenge get to the patients sooner?

It’s bad enough that you have been MIA these past 2 years but now you simply have no excuse.

Teddy needs Provenge now!

Ebenezer Scrooge said of Tiny Tim, “If he is going to die he should do it and decrease the surplus population”.

I hate to be so grim on a Sunday but I have no patience for the FDA’s lack of humanity and no tolerance for the PCF’s non-support of quicker approval of Provenge because they are afraid if they do that it may bruise their ego.

Even Scher and Coffey at the PCF round table said they would rally behind Provenge if the data was there on April 28th…where is the rally?

Really, where is the rally?

Lets go!

No more free pass.

Popularity: 23%