What made me sickest over the Larry King show on prostate cancer was in the beginning of the show, when Larry King stated something along the lines that if they find the cure for prostate cancer they just might have to name it or call it the Milken cure. That set the tone for the show and the angle he was playing.

Larry King lost most of his fortune not too many years ago flipping insurance policy’s under the advice of some scammers. It worked well until he found out he was the mark. To recover, it looks like he went with Madoff, where he was once again taken to the cleaners. In Milken he finally found someone with juice. The show was packed with the mutual admiration society. Milken is doing his image rehabilitation desperately seeking a pardon. Maybe Larry will have Kerry on next (I can dream).

Larry King, Mike Milken, John McEnroe, Colin Powell, Joe Torre, Rudolph Guiliani, a cast of big mouths with not one word to say about Provenge. They are a sickening, pathetic bunch. We know Larry knows about Provenge because many of our friends and members reached out to Larry in the past and more recently before the show. Now if I were a conspiracy theorist…

They never mentioned Provenge, a non toxic, non invasive safe and effective immunotherapy that harnesses and enhances your own healthy cells to fight your own prostate cancer cells. Some men with late stage pc are living 8 years later. 1 in 6 men will get prostate cancer in their lifetime.

Provenge should be on the market by next year, in spite of Milken. His chairman, Howard Scher of the Prostate Cancer Foundation Therapeutic Consortium, and Milken’s recently departed CEO, Alison Martin of the Melanoma Research Alliance, colluded on the leaked letters that stopped Provenge dead in its tracks from reaching the 69,000+ men who have died since May 2007.

Mark Mitchell of Deep Capture recently published an exposé about Milken’s part in the death of 60,000 men and the delay of Provenge. The complete story of Dendreon is now available  21 August 2009
Read the full story

The PCF is also trying to take credit for financing Provenge? It stated this because it sent some money to the University of San Francisco back in the year 2000 for Eric Small to work on immunotherapy. In 2006 Small wrote a rather positive article stating Provenge may work. In 2007 Howie Scher and Alison Martin used that 2006 abstract against Provenge highlighting the word “may” as to say it may not work. PCF cannot take credit here. It can take credit for two of its big shots stopping Provenge which had positive Phase III trials under its belt while Asentar, Abiraterone and GVAX, treatments the PCF touted, were only finished with Phase II trials.

Furthermore, in the 2005 PCF Annual Report, Novacea and Cougar did not give any money to PCF. Dendreon donated between $25k to $50K. Cell Genesis gave between $10K to $25K.

Not only did the PCF do nothing to push for Provenge approval, they actually accepted money from Dendreon to support the PCF. It should have been the other way around. Dendreon was struggling for every dollar it could muster, and must have felt it had to make a donation to PCF too! Something stinks in the world of Milken’s philanthropy and I can smell it all the way in New Jersey.

Continue Reading Hey Larry King! Do your homework!! »

Popularity: 19%

Hold the deck.

It’s certainly okay to have the opinion that the FDA made a reasonable choice at the time it denied approval to Provenge in 2007. It’s not the right opinion, but it is a defendable one. It is not all right, based on what we now know, to say they made the right decision.

On the other hand:

That the Provenge BLA was not afforded proper due process is an absolute. Because it clearly was not afforded proper due process nobody can say with any certainty that the FDA made a reasonable decision. Once the process is corrupted it’s all guesswork from there. Nobody knows for sure the extent of influences and back room shenanigans that occurred to assure that Provenge was not fairly evaluated. When CareToLive through litigation and FOIA’s tried to get information they were stymied by the FDA who went to great lengths to avoid any transparency on the issue.

There are aces scattered all over the floor at the FDA and a couple sticking out of a few sleeves so how can the game have been fairly played? Is it too much to ask for a fair game? The denial of a fair PROCESS is the one truth that the FDA could have, should have, admitted.

If that process occurred in a court room there would, at a minimum, have been declared a mistrial, when the evidence of such became known (which was made known to the FDA by petition, litigation and of course lots of letters).

That they did not make a reasonable and common sense decision based on the class of patients for which Provenge was seeking approval, or conduct a proper risk/benefit analysis with a focus on the fact that the treatment was destined for late stage patients is clear.

The FDA said two things that support this; One was that the minority voices on the AC panel were taken into consideration as a factor in the decision making process, and Two is that Richard Pazdur of CDER influenced that process. Top that off with an FDA commissioner who just happens to be a very good friend of Milken……

I don’t want the point to be lost that it is the position of CareToLive that there is no way anyone can say a reasonable decision was made, because the process was completely corrupted. CareToLive has sought accountability and transparency to determine in what ways the process fell short. If the FDA would show us the process then we might be persuaded otherwise. Until then and even because of the cover up itself, it has to be evaluated based on what we know.

The cover up and the lack of transparency is indicative that the FDA made a choice that transparency would make matters worse in this case. Otherwise, why fight so hard to keep the process from the public eye.

What other influences entered into the picture. Political pressure? Milken pressure? Financial pressure? Inside power struggles? Some or all of the above?

The deck was stacked. The dice were loaded. Everybody knows!

With all that you now know about Milken and the depths of his depravity, does it not trouble you that he had considerable control and influence over at least Scher, Martin and von Eschenbach if not others? Continue Reading American Hold ‘Em »

Popularity: 20%

The FDA blew a golden opportunity.

It took them 2 years of foot dragging to reach their decision on our CareToLive Citizens’ Petition.

They DENIED it!

The only redeeming factor in their pages of excuses, is that the FDA stated 3 times that they will process the amended Dendreon BLA expeditiously.

We at CTL feel the FDA lacks the compassion and the scientific ability to evaluate our Petition.

With the stellar Provenge survival data recently exhibited, we believe the FDA should have immediately reconsidered their death rattle.

Apr 28, 2009
Data Presented at AUA Demonstrate PROVENGE Significantly Prolongs Survival for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer in Pivotal Phase 3 IMPACT Study (LINK)

The dysfunctional, omnipotent FDA has spoken loudly and clearly to the men with late stage prostate cancer who are out of options.

You can’t have a safe and effective immunotherapy yet.

Go home and die!

You can read the FDA’s response here >> fda-response-to-citizens-petition.pdf

Here are some of our thoughts on the FDA response. We welcome your comments.

Before addressing the specific requests in your petition, we first want to make it clear that we share your concern for men suffering from advanced prostate cancer.

Too many men continue dying a painful death while the FDA continues to stonewall the approval of Provenge by not addressing the deception that took place during the Provenge approval process.

We are committed to expeditiously reviewing the new information as soon as it is submitted.

This was the only good thing we read in their response.

PLEASE HURRY.

THIS IS AN EMERGENCY!

FDA shares the goal of approving new products, such as Provenge, as soon as they are shown to be safe and effective.

Provenge has shown all along that it is safe and effective. The Advisory Committee questions are regulatory questions.

Is it safe?

Is there substantial evidence of efficacy?

The panel voted overwhelmingly that it is safe and effective.

The FDA response tried to gloss over the conspiracy and conflict-of-interest issues, simply denying them without offering any evidence.

The agency lied when it said Provenge didn’t slow progression in either 9901 or 9902A. The correct terminology would have been “did not slow progression with statistical significance.”

We think that 11.7 weeks vs. 10.0 weeks in the 9901 trial is evidence of slowed progression.

A p value of 0.052 (Journal of Clinical Oncology number) or 0.085 (FDA number) should not be taken lightly, even if it did barely miss statistical significance.

Combine that with the survival p value of 0.01, and that’s pretty convincing evidence that 9901 was a successful trial.

It is a lie that Provenge did not slow progression in 9901, and it is a lie that there is no positive correlation between progression (91.5-94.8%) and survival (99.0%). The FDA’s progression argument is a LIE.

FDA has a long history of permitting access to investigational drugs to treat serious and immediately life-threatening diseases without adequate available therapies. Individuals can obtain access by enrolling in on-going clinical investigations of such products, including any existing expanded access protocols.

Continue Reading FDA LIES & DENIES — CARE TO LIVE CRIES »

Popularity: 19%

Seems there is no moving forward without moving backwards, as much as moving forward would be the right thing for everyone to do. The FDA won’t allow us to move forward so we must forever walk them through the sins of the past. The FDA dooms themselves to forever be walked through events of the past, events of the present, and events of the future.

While they have the power to end it happily like good old Ebenezer, and to help Tiny Tim (Teddy), they choose to let it end without redemption for themselves. Ebenezer Scrooge epitomizes the current FDA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qY2TT_aj_Fw&feature=fvsr

First, today, we visit the Provenge of May’s gone past.

As you know shortly after the FDA announced that they were not going to approve Provenge in May 2007 advocates met with then commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach to discuss the mistake the FDA had made in denying the BLA for Provenge and not allowing late stage prostate cancer patients to have Provenge.

It appeared that absent from the group of advocates at that meeting was anyone from the Prostate Cancer Foundation. However, unbeknownst to the advocates there meeting with Dr. von Eschenbach, the Prostate Cancer Foundation was in fact there. The problem was they were there on the other side.

The Prostate Cancer Foundation had and has the ear of former commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. It is now crystal clear that if they would have gone they would have been sitting on von Eschenbach’s side of the table. Since the Commissioner has left the FDA, CareToLive has requested his help and he has declined (that request was renewed after the data came in).

The advocates at the advocacy meeting might not have seen it in Andy’s eyes but in them were, Michael Milken, Jonathan Simons and Stuart Holden all from the PCF.

They had and have the ear of Dr. von Eschenbach. What good could it do for the advocates to meet with Andy von Eschenbach when the largest prostate cancer patient advocacy group was absent and was in fact telling von Eshenbach to do the opposite that the advocates at the meeting were advocating for? Did those advocates know that they were speaking to the commissioner and the PCF? It’s kind of like the old poker adage; if you are sitting at a poker table and you don’t know who the sucker is, it’s you. The chair that spoke loudest was the chair that sat empty. When is the PCF going to pull up its chair to the right side of the table?

Thy enemy has shown thyself and that enemy is within the advocacy groups themselves. In deference to Michael’s love for baseball: Does anyone doubt that if the PCF would just step up to the plate and call for accelerated approval they could hit a home run.

In September of 2007 on behalf of CareToLive I sent a letter to Michael Milken by regular U.S. mail seeking his support for the effort to make Provenge available to late stage prostate cancer patients. That letter was never responded to.

Aren’t Mr. Milken and his groups in favor of speedier approval and access to treatments for late stage disease when the patients are without good alternatives?

Michael Milken founded the group Faster Cures which has shown no indication that it is in fact willing to support getting treatments such as Provenge to the patients faster.

Mike Milken says:

FasterCures

This Washington, D.C.-based think tank is removing barriers to progress against all life-threatening diseases.

The FasterCures team is dedicated to saving lives by saving time.
Milken Institute

Mike and his Faster Cures both remain MIA!!

More importantly, the greatest scientific achievement in late stage prostate cancer treatment in modern history and the PCF does nothing to help groups like CareToLive and others to try and speed it to the patients. If not now when? They have no right to call themselves prostate cancer patient advocates. Since the new data was announced CareToLive again sought the assistance of the multimillion dollar funded Prostate Cancer Foundation. These requests have repeatedly been made by CareToLive and they have repeatedly been ignored by the largest, most powerful and influential prostate cancer advocacy group first made in 2007 and then later made by request at the April 24th 2009 PCF round table in Washington D.C. and then later made by e-mails and finally culminating in the open letter sent by e-mail and regular U.S. mail to PCF CEO Jonathan Simons.

Soon after the advocates meeting with Dr. von Eschenbach after the Provenge denial in 2007 came this event:

Los Angeles, 2007 Milken Institute Global Conference
Building a Food and Drug Administration for the 21st Century

Moderator:
Greg Simon, President, FasterCures/The Center for Accelerating Medical Solutions

Panelists:
David Gratzer, Senior Fellow, Center for Medical Progress, Manhattan Institute
Andrew von Eschenbach, Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Greg Simon, President of FasterCures/The Center for Accelerating Medical Solutions and panel moderator began by asking how we can take the FDA we have today and get to the one we need for the 21st century. Andrew von Eschenbach, Commissioner of the FDA said, “in essence, the FDA is an information management business, and the world around us is changing fast and the data is changing also.” Personalized medicine will fundamentally change how the FDA approaches its work and how it is organized and the types of skill sets employees need. Dr. von Eschenbach talked about how science has crossed the threshold where diseases can be viewed through a molecular prism. “This doesn’t have to be about the science of safety or efficacy, with new molecular medicine we can have both,” he pointed out.

Balancing patient safety with access will be critical. “We have these discussions and a lot of time is spent on safety but we need to be sure we have an innovative drug market,” offered David Gratzer, Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Moving towards a “lifecycle approach” at the FDA that balances safety and access is critical and was a key message of the 2006 Institute of Medicine study on drug safety.

Beth Seidenberg, Partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers pointed out that the future is now. Programs at the FDA like the Critical Path Initiative need even more support and resources. “We need to give the FDA the tools, people, and money to ensure the agency can take advantage of these scientific advances.” A system of integrated medical information based on electronic health records and data sharing will allow for more streamlined post-marketing surveillance and will get the FDA away from paper to electronic files. Resources and systems change are needed to advance these IT systems at the agency. “We need to get around the proprietary relationship to data and see that having access to large population data sets is the only way to advance.”

When Greg Simon asked each panelist to name the most important next step for the agency two themes emerged: getting the agency more resources and the creation of a creative strategic plan that embraces the possibility of how personalized medicine can change how we currently approve drugs.

Andy also says:
http://www.mikemilken.com/videos.taf?video=6&type=wmp

Mr. Milken and the PCF: Today there are an estimated 10 million cancer survivors just in America alone — men and women who in many cases have life expectancies measured in months, not years. “Many would gladly enlist as foot soldiers in an effort to help cure a disease that in many cases will be genetically passed on to their children and grandchildren.”

* “Cancer researchers, clinicians, and patient advocates rarely speak with one voice on any subject related to the disease. They fight over funding priorities; they squabble over treatment options; they joust over the relevance of biological discoveries. But virtually everyone agrees that Milken deserves an enormous share of the credit for the progress made against this major killer. ‘Mike’s done more for prostate cancer research than anyone in America,’ says one of the nation’s best-known prostate surgeons, Patrick Walsh, head of urology at Johns Hopkins.”
* ” ‘Michael Milken changed the culture of [medical] research,’ says Andrew von Eschenbach, director of the National Cancer Institute. ‘He created a sense of urgency that focused on results and shortened the timeline. It took a business mindset to shake things up. What he’s done is now the model.’”

* ” ‘Michael is always thinking creatively,’ says [Dr. Leroy] Hood, sounding like a convert. ‘He transformed how you do research in the field of prostate cancer and how you think about aggressively going after a disease. It has been a real revolution.’ ”

Mr. Milken, Mr. Simons we want to speak with one voice, why won’t you return our call?

Why won’t you respond to our e-mails?

Why won’t you help us to help late stage cancer patients now?

Where is the disagreement with regards to Provenge and WHY won’t you help?

So you backed the wrong horse but there is still time to change your bets, still time to turn the cart upright, still time to wipe that egg off your face and move forward.

HELP!!!!!

Here is what the PCF as a group says:

Although there has been dramatic progress in finding better treatments, the impending increase in incidence makes the need greater than ever. Fortunately, recent advances in science have made the opportunities greater than ever as well. With your support, we will be able to pursue more of these opportunities and hasten the day when prostate cancer is merely a sad memory.

Hey PCF, why won’t you give us a straight answer on our call for helping Provenge get to the patients sooner?

It’s bad enough that you have been MIA these past 2 years but now you simply have no excuse.

Teddy needs Provenge now!

Ebenezer Scrooge said of Tiny Tim, “If he is going to die he should do it and decrease the surplus population”.

I hate to be so grim on a Sunday but I have no patience for the FDA’s lack of humanity and no tolerance for the PCF’s non-support of quicker approval of Provenge because they are afraid if they do that it may bruise their ego.

Even Scher and Coffey at the PCF round table said they would rally behind Provenge if the data was there on April 28th…where is the rally?

Really, where is the rally?

Lets go!

No more free pass.

Popularity: 23%

Week #6 Rockville/Bethesda/Chevy Chase Gazette Ad Campaign

Read/Download Richard Ripp Rockville Gazette Ad richardrippgazettecolor.pdf

Please visit the FDA Protest 5/30/08 page and help us spread the word. There is much that everyone can do to help raise awareness. Thanks. CareToLive

(click to enlarge)

Popularity: 21%

May 6 at 8AM
Keynote speaker: Janet Woodcock, MD, Deputy Commissioner, FDA, Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

http://www.temple.edu/pharmacy_qara/08agenda.htm

VISIT OUR RALLY PAGE FOR MAY 30, 2008 NATIONWIDE PROSTATE CANCER DEMONSTRATION DETAILS http://caretolive.com/rally/

We are also looking for a demonstration coordinator to organize outside of Michael Milken’s The Prostate Cancer Foundation in Santa Monica. They have sadly been silent regarding the Provenge delay and need a wake up call.

HOPE TO SEE YOU AT THE PROTEST!

Popularity: 18%

4/16/08 The Care To Live Awareness Campaign in the Rockville Gazette, continues to confront the FDA to address our Petition for the FDA to Reconsider their decision to delay Provenge in what was an unprecedented action by them to delay a treatment in an end stage disease where no other options exist, despite the fact that Provenge was voted 17-0 Safe and 13-4 Efficacious by an FDA Advisory Panel.

Please email, print and fax our ads to help increase awareness of the Provenge Debacle so we may reverse this tragedy. It is over a year since the Advisory Panel was convened. 30,000 American men die each year of prostate cancer. 1 in 6 men will get prostate cancer in their lifetimes. We need better, safer treatments NOW! The FDA needs to address the needs of the men with end stage prostate cancer, and allow them access to the immunotherapy Provenge IMMEDIATELY!

Stephen H. Study Died without ever receiving Provenge. Shame on those individuals at the FDA responsible for this genocide. They are so concerned about selling men drugs to enhance their sex lives, and have completely ignored the real needs of our men, the approval of drugs that have prolonged survival. Some men who received Provenge in trials are alive 6 years longer.

Week #3 Color Ad caretoliverockvillegazettesstudyad3a.pdf

Week #3 Black & White Ad caretoliverockvillegazettesstudyad3abw.pdf

Popularity: 18%

WEEK #2

Week 2 Ad Color caretoliverockvillegazette2ad.pdf

Week 2 Ad Black & White caretoliverockvillegazette2adbw.pdf

Popularity: 13%

We are hot on the trail of the miscreants that derailed Provenge, a safe and effective immunotherapy for prostate cancer, condemning 30,000 American men to death without hope, in order to reap windfall profits.

Ed Silverman of Pharmalot reports on the shenanigans. (click link)

They may have taken down the links but we have the Proquest Investments 2007 Scientific Advisory Committee on our CareToLive research page showing the connections to Howard Scher and Milken’s Prostate Cancer Foundation that claims they want faster cures, yet remained mum on the Provenge Debacle. 3 Congressment are now calling for a Congressional hearing.

See our prior blog on Michael Milken’s Prostate Cancer Foundation and The Proquest Investment Fund / Howard Scher /FDA Unholy Alliance.(click link)

CareToLive is asking the public to help get to the bottom of the Provenge debacle by joining Congressmen Mike Michaud of Maine, Dan Burton of Indiana, and Tim Ryan of Ohio, who are calling for a congressional hearing into what happened. Contact your elected officials to ask for a congressional hearing, visiting the CareToLive website, dig our blogs, and join in the battle.

30,000 American men will die each year (not to mention the rest of the world) without this safe and effective immunotherapy. 1 in 6 men will get prostate cancer int heir lifetime. The FDA’s delay of Provenge was unprecedented in a terminal disease with an overwhelmingly positive panel that showed survival advantages, where no other options exist. Only one treatment for prostate cancer has been approved in 42 years. Send a clear message to Congress, the dysfunctional FDA, Wall Street, and the Chemo Cartel that we want this nontoxic immunotherapy approved NOW! More than 10 years of trials have shown it increases survival. Some men are alive as long as 6 years.

CONGRESSIONAL LETTER ASKING FOR A HEARING  PDF (click here) Please fax this letter to your own congressional representatives and ask them to join this action. TIA
Continue Reading Proquest Tries to Cover Its Tracks over Scher Provenge Debacle »

Popularity: 18%

While Michael Milken and the Prostate Cancer Foundation are whooping it up at the ballgame, some men are sneaking off to have their testicles removed in hopes that it will stop their PSA from rising, and their lives from ending prematurely from late stage prostate cancer. 1 in 6 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetimes. Over 30,000 American men will die from prostate cancer this year. Only 1 very toxic drug has been approved for late stage pc in over 42 years.

Along came Dendreon’s Provenge, an Immunotherapy voted overwhelmingly safe and effective by the FDA’s panel of experts convened to review Provenge. Was there foul play afoot when the FDA decided to delay approval. Perhaps if our men put some extra pine tar on their bats, we could get some coverage of this story. You would think that the deaths of 15,000 men since the delay would be enough.

Note the Picture on the bottom — David Solit, Tommy Lasorda, Dr. Howard Soule, Dr. Howard Scher and Mike Milken join together in support of the PCF’s Home Run Challenge at the New York Mets vs. Anaheim Angels game on June 10th, 2005 (click link)

Why hasn’t Michael Milken and his Prostate Cancer Foundation stepped up to the plate and publicly voiced his disappointment and disapproval of the decision by the FDA to delay Provenge? Is Milken financially conflicted? The whole thing is permeating a stench in the world of financially conflicted advocacy groups. Continue Reading Michael Milken and the Prostate Cancer Foundation’s Foul Balls »

Popularity: 47%